Houthi-Persian fanaticism to plunder Yemen's resources

English - Wednesday 10 June 2020 الساعة 09:47 am
Aden, Newsyemen, private:

The decision of the so-called "Zakat law" issued by the Houthis recently sparked criticism in the Yemeni street, saying that one-fifth of the Bani Hashem ethnic segregation and tribal intolerance is pre-Islamic matters revived by the Persian project to attack Islamic countries.

Yemeni writers and activists on social media described the Houthi zakat legislation as a "racist ", which they virtually rule all the people in their areas of control for 5 years.

The new Houthi amendments in the so-called “Zakat” law included the looting of 20% of the Yemeni funds in the name of “the fifth”, including ore and minerals extracted from the ground or the sea, and in honey if it is from trees or caves.

Nabil Al-Soufi said that "Hashemite people want everything for the family of the Prophet, on the pretext of his love and obedience, then they will not stop from cursing his wives and companions."

He added on his Facebook page: "The Houthis have nothing to do with the Prophet, nor his religion ... they are enemies. Hashemite intolerance of pre-Islamic fanaticism, this fanaticism is revived by the Persian Empire to break up the Islamic unity that Islam brought.

 Faisal al-Shabibi commented, "It is not surprising that what was mentioned in the Zakat Law. 

All the blood that the Houthis have shed for nearly 20 years is for the word (my master) and for the sake of talking people's money unlawfully in the name of (Zakat)."

He pointed out that "the law alone is capable of reviewing those who were deceived by the Houthi-racist and Houthi ideology and returning them to their senses."

In turn, Yahya Al-Thulaya said on his Facebook page, that the alleged Houthi law granted the Hashemites themselves, as descendants, with blatant and explicit materials, from the central resources of the state with the justification that they are (from Bani Hashem).

He added, "This is the first contemporary document in Yemen and the Islamic world, which sorts the population on an ethnic basis in this bold form and the Houthi militias must bear its consequences."

Al-Thulaya pointed out that the Al-Houthi militia provided an unequivocal recognition that there is a difference between the Yemeni citizen and the Hashemite element in rights, duties and privileges.

As for Thabit Al-Ahmadi, what is called the law was considered nothing more than the acquisition and robbery of people's money in a codified manner, and that it is not new for the Houthis, the alleged of this law is based on jurisprudential references, the most important of which are provisions for Imam Al-Hadi, and Al-Azhar by Ahmed bin Yahya Al-Murtada, the theoretical guide of the imams from the life of the Mahdi to today.

He wrote, "The alleged law does not mean that the process of pillaging and appropriation of people's money will stop at the specified items. Rather, in their jurisprudential references, it is permissible for the guardian to take from people’s money other than zakat and charity."

He stressed that we must stop this absurdity that affects the nation, based on ancient historical laws, falsely attributed it to religion, and it contradicts the purposes of religion, and that we stand for the values of the state that suffices from universally accepted taxes, and codified by civil regulations and legislation, supporting the economy of the state, not the pockets of influential people or priests, and in return, citizens get to serve this country.