Legitimacy and references ... Jumping away from the Riyadh Agreement to consolidate the balance of failure
English - Saturday 27 February 2021 الساعة 08:40 am
Mokha, NewsYemen, Bassem Ali:
Lately, there have been calls from large leaderships calculated on the legitimacy of the legitimacy to market initiatives for a solution that include a return to the Gulf initiative and the outcomes of the National Dialogue Conference, in a heterogeneous combination even in terms of building its provisions.
This drifting behind a romantic American movement, far from the complexities of the reality on the ground, reveals some of the reasons for the defeat that was addicted to legitimacy and its readiness for successive defeats, only to live the illusion of the reality before the Houthi coup.
The last agreement that was concluded and constitutes a path to leave the square of defeats by directing the forces to the battle fronts with the Houthi militia was the Riyadh Agreement, but the attempts to jump and hang onto the windmills have a heavy cost to the people and the coalition and to everyone who sincerely confronts the Houthi militia.
What legitimacy seeks, specifically the Muslim Brotherhood, the faction most controlling its decision, is to bypass the Riyadh agreement and return the south as a marginal card in the Yemeni file, while the solution is decided between Islah, the conference and the Houthis, the third of them if the American moves can subdue his disobedience to everything that leads to peace and an end to the war.
The Muslim Brotherhood, and the legitimacy behind them, reject the opportunity to achieve military success in the field over the Houthi militia, and for the southern forces to be an active partner on the fronts to break the Houthi superiority by controlling an important geography.
This rejection is due to the belief that the Riyadh Agreement has granted the Southern Transitional Council a partnership in the decision that is not deserved .. In return, legitimacy, the Brotherhood and the international community seek to negotiate with the Houthis, since they have control on the ground, while the southerners also have wide control that gives them this advantage and more than the Houthis For many considerations.
Legitimacy deals with the south as liberated areas, and the Houthis negotiated them as a party to the table, but the legitimacy and the Brotherhood do not recognize who liberated the south or who has the current control over it, in a strange contradiction .. they want geography without its rulers controlling the land.
A group of the leaders of the southern legitimacy and all the Brotherhood and a large sector in the legitimacy deal with the new reality in the south as a temporary stage and the subordination of the decision to the south returns to Sana'a as it was before, and they forget that this new reality in the south is the only gateway that may restore legitimacy to Sana'a.
Aidaroos al-Zubaidi tells them that we will fight with you until we reach seventy in Sanaa, and they respond to him by describing the forces of the people of the south that rule their areas as being Emirati occupiers, while the control of the Taiz Brotherhood’s sons over their governorate is legitimate and logical as well.
Whoever liberates his land and is currently protecting it from any dangers is an occupier, while the Houthi militia, in their view, is a component that must be dealt with according to a political settlement if he accepts that, bearing in mind that the Houthi militia has never implemented any agreement it signed from its first act of sabotage and rebel in the Saada Mountains. 28 years ago.
Legitimacy does not have a clear course of action for the war against the Houthis, and therefore it is wishing for devastating defeats, and has not preserved any military gains it achieved with the support of the coalition, and it also does not have a specific negotiating path that enables the world to support it .. It did not succeed in the war and failed to negotiate, and the Sweden agreement is clear evidence Despite its failure, and what is happening in Marib today is an expected result of the failure of legitimacy in the negotiation track.
Legitimacy must realize that reality has changed, and that the south is no longer the branch that will return to the original, but rather it is a force factor in defeating the Houthis and restoring Sana'a instead of pursuing the scheme to return Aden to the bank of the Brotherhood’s gains in the liberated areas.
